لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
Case files may be accessed from the public access terminals from the clerk’s office with the court where the case was filed.
Some bodies are supplied statutory powers to issue assistance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.
The stated recovery may very well be used, in the most, for corroboration from the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be described as a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of incidence. The explained memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as nothing at all was discovered because of this kind of pointation. The place of incidence in addition to the place of throwing the dead body were already from the knowledge of witnesses before their pointation by the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Please use 1 username and password set from the options. If it does not work please check out the other. Each individual allows single consumer access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.
If a sufferer is shot at point-blank selection, it might still be fair to infer that the accused intended death. However, that is not really always the case.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
Knowledge with the accused is really a matter to get inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is quite challenging for being proved otherwise.”
Consequently, it was held that the right into a healthy environment was part with the fundamental right to life and more info right to dignity, under Article nine and 14 with the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all sides of human existence, all this sort of amenities and services that a person is entitled to appreciate with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its probable to secure economic interests and maintain the integrity on the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of those changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.
Because of this, basically citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling somebody to tell them you’ve found their shed phone, then telling them you live in these-and-this kind of community, without actually giving them an address. Driving around the community attempting to find their phone is probably going for being more frustrating than it’s well worth.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and regarded scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.